Realtime

Search…
Realtime
Tuning Realtime Performance
See the section on Ingesting Realtime Data before reading this section.
Pinot servers ingest rows into a consuming segment that resides in volatile memory. Therefore, pinot servers hosting consuming segments tend to be memory bound. They may also have long garbage collection cycles when the segment is completed and memory is released.
Controlling memory allocation
You can configure pinot servers to use off-heap memory for dictionary and forward indices of consuming segments by setting the value of pinot.server.instance.realtime.alloc.offheap to true. With this configuration in place, the server allocates off-heap memory by memory-mapping files. These files are never flushed to stable storage by Pinot (the Operating System may do so depending on demand for memory on the host). The files are discarded when the consuming segment is turned into a completed segment.
By default the files are created under the directory where the table’s segments are stored in local disk attached to the consuming server. You can set a specific directory for consuming segments with the configuration pinot.server.consumerDir. Given that there is no control over flushing of pages from the memory mapped for consuming segments, you may want to set the directory to point to a memory-based file system, eliminating wasteful disk I/O.
If memory-mapping is not desirable, you can set pinot.server.instance.realtime.alloc.offheap.direct to true. In this case, pinot allocates direct ByteBuffer objects for consuming segments. Using direct allocation can potentially result in address space fragmentation.
Note
We still use heap memory to store inverted indices for consuming segments.
Controlling number of rows in consuming segment
The number of rows in a consuming segment needs to be balanced. Having too many rows can result in memory pressure. On the other hand, having too few rows results in having too many small segments. Having too many segments can be detrimental to query performance, and also increase pressure on the Helix.
The recommended way to do this is to use the realtime.segment.flush.threshold.segment.size setting as described in StreamConfigs Section. You can run the administrative tool pinot-admin.sh RealtimeProvisioningHelper that will help you to come up with an optimal setting for the segment size.
Moving completed segments to different hosts
This feature is available only if the consumption type is LowLevel.
The structure of the consuming segments and the completed segments are very different. The memory, CPU, I/O and GC characteristics could be very different while processing queries on these segments. Therefore it may be useful to move the completed segments onto different set of hosts in some use cases.
You can host completed segments on a different set of hosts using the tagOverrideConfig as described in Table Config. Pinot will automatically move them once the consuming segments are completed.
If you require more fine-tuned control over how segments are hosted on different hosts, we recommend that you use the Tag-Based Instance Assignment feature to accomplish this.
Using tag-based instance assignment to host completed segments on different hosts:
1
  "instanceAssignmentConfigMap": {
2
    "CONSUMING": {
3
      "tagPoolConfig": {
4
        "tag": "DefaultTenant_REALTIME"
5
      },
6
      "replicaGroupPartitionConfig": {
7
        "replicaGroupBased": true,
8
        "numReplicaGroups": 2,
9
        "numInstancesPerReplicaGroup": 2
10
      }
11
    },
12
    "COMPLETED": {
13
      "tagPoolConfig": {
14
        "tag": "DefaultTenant_OFFLINE"
15
      },
16
      "replicaGroupPartitionConfig": {
17
        "replicaGroupBased": true,
18
        "numReplicaGroups": 2,
19
        "numInstancesPerReplicaGroup": 4
20
      }
21
    }
22
  }
23
...
Copied!
Controlling segment build vs segment download on Realtime servers
This feature is available only if the consumption type is LowLevel.
When a realtime segment completes, a winner server is chosen as a committer amongst all replicas by the controller. That committer builds the segment and uploads to the controller. The non-committer servers are asked to catchup to the winning offset. If the non-committer servers are able to catch up, they are asked to build the segment and replace the in-memory segment. If they are unable to catchup, they are asked to download the segment from the controller.
Building a segment can cause excessive garbage and may result in GC pauses on the server. Long GC pauses can affect query processing. In order to avoid this, we have a configuration that allows you to control whether
It might become desirable to force the non-committer servers to download the segment from the controller, instead of building it again. The completionConfig as described in Table Config can be used to configure this.
Fine tuning the segment commit protocol
This feature is available only if the consumption type is LowLevel.
Once a committer is asked to commit the segment, it builds a segment, and issues an HTTP POST to the controller, with the segment. The controller than commits the segment in Zookeeper and starts the next consuming segment.
It is possible to conifigure the servers to do a split commit, in which the committer performs the following steps:
Build the segment
Start a transaction with the lead controller to commit the segment (CommitStart phase)
Post the completed segment to any of the controllers (and the controller posts it to segment store)
End the transaction with the lead controller (CommentEnd phase). Optionally, this step can be done with the segment metadata.
This method of committing can be useful if the network bandwidth on the lead controller is limiting segment uploads.In order to accomplish this, you will need to set the following configurations:
On the controller, set pinot.controller.enable.split.commit to true (default is false).
On the server, set pinot.server.enable.split.commit to true (default is false).
On the server, set pinot.server.enable.commitend.metadata to true (default is false).
RealtimeProvisioningHelper
This tool can help decide the optimum segment size and number of hosts for your table. You will need one sample Pinot segment from your table before you run this command. If you have an offline segment, you can use that. Alternatively, you can provision a test version of your table with some minimum number of hosts that can consume the stream, let it create a few segments with large enough number of rows (say, 500k to 1M rows), and use one of those segments to run the command. You can drop the test version table, and re-provision it once the command outputs some parameters to set.
As of Pinot version 0.5.0, this command has been improved to display the number of pages mapped, as well as take in the push frequency as an argument if the realtime table being provisioned is a part of a hybrid table. If you are using an older version of this command, please download a later version and re-run the command. The arguments to the command are as follows:
tableConfigFile: This is the path to the table config file
numPartitions: Number of partitions in your stream
numHosts: This is a list of the number of hosts for which you need to compute the actual parameters. For example, if you are planning to deploy between 4 and 8 hosts, you may specify 4,6,8. In this case, the parameters will be computed for each configuration -- that of 4 hosts, 6 hosts, and 8 hosts. You can then decide which of these configurations to use.
numHours : This is a list of maximum number of hours you want your consuming segments to be in consuming state. After these many hours the segment will move to completed state, even if other criteria (like segment size or number of rows) are not met yet. This value must be smaller than the retention of your stream. If you specify too small a value, then you run the risk of creating too many segments, this resulting in sub-optimal query performance. If you specify this value to be too big, then you may run the risk of having too large segments, running out of "hot" memory (consuming segments are in read-write memory). Specify a few different (comma-separated) values, and the command computes the segment size for each of these.
sampleCompletedSegmentDir: The path of the directory in which the sample segment is present.
pushFrequency : This is optional. If this is a hybrid table, then enter the frequency with which offline segments are pushed (one of "hourly", "daily", "weekly" or "monthly"). This argument is ignored if retentionHours is specified.
maxUsableHostMemory: This is the total memory available in each host for hosting retentionHours worth of data (i.e. "hot" data) of this table. Remember to leave some for query processing (or other tables, if you have them in the same hosts). If your latency needs to be very low, this value should not exceed the physical memory available to store pinot segments of this table, on each host in your cluster. On the other hand, if you are trying to lower cost and can take higher latencies, consider specifying a bigger value here. Pinot will leave the rest to the Operating System to page memory back in as necessary.
retentionHours : This argument should specify how many hours of data will typically be queried on your table. It is assumed that these are the most recent hours. If pushFrequency is specified, then it is assumed that the older data will be served by the offline table, and the value is derived automatically. For example, if pushFrequency is daily, this value defaults to 72. If hourly, then 24. If weekly, then 8d. If monthly, then 32d. If neither pushFrequency nor retentionHours is specified, then this value is assumed to be the retention time of the realtime table (e.g. if the table is retained for 6 months, then it is assumed that most queries will retrieve all six months of data). As an example, if you have a realtime only table with a 21 day retention, and expect that 90% of your queries will be for the most recent 3 days, you can specify a retentionHours value of 72. This will help you configure a system that performs much better for most of your queries while taking a performance hit for those that occasionally query older data.
ingestionRate : Specify the average number of rows ingested per second per partition of your stream.
One you run the command, it produces an output as below:
1
============================================================
2
RealtimeProvisioningHelperCommand -tableConfigFile /Users/ssubrama/tmp/samza/realtimeTableConfig.json -numPartitions 16 -pushFrequency null -numHosts 8,6,10 -numHours 6,12,18,24 -sampleCompletedSegmentDir /Users/ssubrama/tmp/samza/TestSamzaAnalyticsFeatures_1593411480000_1593500340000_0/ -ingestionRate 100 -maxUsableHostMemory 10G -retentionHours 72
3
​
4
Note:
5
​
6
* Table retention and push frequency ignored for determining retentionHours
7
* See https://docs.pinot.apache.org/operators/operating-pinot/tuning/realtime
8
​
9
Memory used per host (Active/Mapped)
10
​
11
numHosts --> 6               |8               |10              |
12
numHours
13
 6 --------> 5.05G/19.49G    |3.37G/12.99G    |3.37G/12.99G    |
14
12 --------> 5.89G/20.33G    |3.93G/13.55G    |3.93G/13.55G    |
15
18 --------> 6.73G/21.49G    |4.48G/14.33G    |4.48G/14.33G    |
16
24 --------> 7.56G/22G       |5.04G/14.66G    |5.04G/14.66G    |
17
​
18
Optimal segment size
19
​
20
numHosts --> 6               |8               |10              |
21
numHours
22
 6 --------> 111.98M         |111.98M         |111.98M         |
23
12 --------> 223.96M         |223.96M         |223.96M         |
24
18 --------> 335.94M         |335.94M         |335.94M         |
25
24 --------> 447.92M         |447.92M         |447.92M         |
26
​
27
Consuming memory
28
​
29
numHosts --> 6               |8               |10              |
30
numHours
31
 6 --------> 1.45G           |987.17M         |987.17M         |
32
12 --------> 2.61G           |1.74G           |1.74G           |
33
18 --------> 3.77G           |2.52G           |2.52G           |
34
24 --------> 4.94G           |3.29G           |3.29G           |
35
​
36
Number of segments queried per host
37
​
38
numHosts --> 6               |8               |10              |
39
numHours
40
 6 --------> 12              |12              |12              |
41
12 --------> 6               |6               |6               |
42
18 --------> 4               |4               |4               |
43
24 --------> 3               |3               |3               |
Copied!
The idea here is to choose an optimal segment size so that :
1.The number of segments searched for your queries are minimized
2.The segment size is neither too large not too small (where "large" and "small" are as per the range for your table).
3.Overall memory is optimized for your table, considering the other tables in the host, the query traffic, etc.
You can pick the appropriate value for segment size and number of hours in the table config, and set the number of rows to zero. Note that you don't have to pick values exactly as given in each of these combinations (they are calculated guesses anyway). Feel free to choose some values in between or out of range as you feel fit, and adjust them after your table is in production (no restarts required, things will slowly adjust themselves to the new configuration). The example given below chooses from the output.
Case 1: Optimize for performance, high QPS
From the above output you may decide that 6 hours is an optimal consumption time given the number of active segments looked at for a query, and you can afford about 4G of active memory per host. You can choose either 8 or 10 hosts, you choose 10. In this case, the optimal segment size will be 111.98M. You can then enter your realtime table config as below:
1
"realtime.segment.flush.threshold.rows": "0"
2
"realtime.segment.flush.threshold.time": "6h"
3
"realtime.segment.flush.threshold.segment.size": "112M"
Copied!
Case 2: Optimize for cost, low QPS
You may decide from the output that you want to make do with 6 hosts. You have only 2G of memory per host for active segments but you are willing to map 8G of active memory on that, with plenty of paging for each query. Since QPS is low, you may have plenty of CPU per query so huge segments may not be a problem. Choose 12 or 24h or consumption and pick an appropriate segment size. You may then configure something like:
1
"realtime.segment.flush.threshold.rows": "0"
2
"realtime.segment.flush.threshold.time": "24h"
3
"realtime.segment.flush.threshold.segment.size": "450M"
Copied!
Tuning
Routing
Last modified 1d ago
Copy link
Contents
Tuning Realtime Performance
Controlling memory allocation
Controlling number of rows in consuming segment
Moving completed segments to different hosts
Controlling segment build vs segment download on Realtime servers
Fine tuning the segment commit protocol
RealtimeProvisioningHelper