While Pinot can work with segments of various sizes, for optimal use of Pinot, you want to get your segments sized in the 100MB to 500MB (un-tarred/uncompressed) range. Please note that having too many (thousands or more) of tiny segments for a single table just creates more overhead in terms of the metadata storage in Zookeeper as well as in the Pinot servers' heap. At the same time, having too few really large (GBs) segments reduces parallelism of query execution, as on the server side, the thread parallelism of query execution is at segment level.
Yes. Each table can be independently configured to consume from any given Kafka topic, regardless of whether there are other tables that are also consuming from the same Kafka topic.
The partitioning logic in the stream should match the partitioning config in Pinot. Kafka uses
murmur2, and the equivalent in Pinot is
Set partitioning config as below using same column used in Kafka
"numPartitions": 12 // same as number of kafka partitions
and also set
For JSON, you can use hex encoded string to ingest BYTES
To use explicit code points, you must double-quote (not single-quote) the string, and escape the code point via "\uHHHH", where HHHH is the four digit hex code for the character. See https://yaml.org/spec/spec.html#escaping/in%20double-quoted%20scalars/ for more details.
By default, Pinot limits the length of a String column to 512 bytes. If you want to overwrite this value, you can set the maxLength attribute in the schema as follows:
Events are available to be read by queries as soon as they are ingested. This is because events are instantly indexed in-memory upon ingestion.
The ingestion of events into the real-time table is not transactional, so replicas of the open segment are not immediately consistent. Pinot trades consistency for availability upon network partitioning (CAP theorem) to provide ultra-low ingestion latencies at high throughput.
Applying inverted indexes to a table config will generate an inverted index for all new segments. To apply the inverted indexes to all existing segments, see How to apply an inverted index to existing segments?
Once you've done that, you can check whether the index has been applied by querying the segment metadata API at http://localhost:9000/help#/Segment/getServerMetadata. Don't forget to include the names of the column on which you have applied the index.
The output from this API should look something like the following:
Not all indexes can be retrospectively applied to existing segments.
Star-tree indexes are configured in the table config under the tableIndexConfig -> starTreeIndexConfigs (list) and enableDefaultStarTree (boolean). Read more about how to configure star-tree indexes: https://docs.pinot.apache.org/basics/indexing/star-tree-index#index-generation
The new segments will have star-tree indexes generated after applying the star-tree index configs to the table config. Currently, Pinot does not support adding star-tree indexes to the existing segments.
Pinot does not require ordering of event time stamps. Out of order events are still consumed and indexed into the "currently consuming" segment. In a pathological case, if you have a 2 day old event come in "now", it will still be stored in the segment that is open for consumption "now". There is no strict time-based partitioning for segments, but star-indexes and hybrid tables will handle this as appropriate.
See the Components > Broker for more details about how hybrid tables handle this. Specifically, the time-boundary is computed as
max(OfflineTIme) - 1 unit of granularity. Pinot does store the min-max time for each segment and uses it for pruning segments, so segments with multiple time intervals may not be perfectly pruned.
When generating star-indexes, the time column will be part of the star-tree so the tree can still be efficiently queried for segments with multiple time intervals.
This lets you have an old event up come in without building complex offline pipelines that perfectly partition your events by event timestamps. With this offset, even if your offline data pipeline produces segments with a maximum timestamp, Pinot will not use the offline dataset for that last chunk of segments. The expectation is if you process offline the next time-range of data, your data pipeline will include any late events.
It might seem odd that segments are not strictly time-partitioned, unlike similar systems such as Apache Druid. This allows real-time ingestion to consume out-of-order events. Even though segments are not strictly time-partitioned, Pinot will still index, prune, and query segments intelligently by time-intervals to for performance of hybrid tables and time-filtered data.
When generating offline segments, the segments generated such that segments only contain one time-interval and are well partitioned by the time column.