Forward Index
The values for every column are stored in a forward index, of which there are three types:
Dictionary encoded forward index Builds a dictionary mapping 0 indexed ids to each unique value in a column and a forward index that contains the bit-compressed ids.
Sorted forward index Builds a dictionary mapping from each unique value to a pair of start and end document id and a forward index on top of the dictionary encoding.
Raw value forward index Builds a forward index of the column's values.
Dictionary-encoded forward index with bit compression (default)
Each unique value from a column is assigned an id and a dictionary is built that maps the id to the value. The forward index stores bit-compressed ids instead of the values. If you have few unique values, dictionary-encoding can significantly improve space efficiency.
The below diagram shows the dictionary encoding for two columns with integer
and string
types. ForcolA
, dictionary encoding saved a significant amount of space for duplicated values.
On the other hand, colB
has no duplicated data. Dictionary encoding will not compress much data in this case where there are a lot of unique values in the column. For the string
type, we pick the length of the longest value and use it as the length for the dictionary’s fixed-length value array. The padding overhead can be high if there are a large number of unique values for a column.
Sorted forward index with run-length encoding
When a column is physically sorted, Pinot uses a sorted forward index with run-length encoding on top of the dictionary-encoding. Instead of saving dictionary ids for each document id, Pinot will store a pair of start and end document ids for each value.
(For simplicity, this diagram does not include the dictionary encoding layer.)
The Sorted forward index has the advantages of both good compression and data locality. The Sorted forward index can also be used as an inverted index.
Real-time tables
A sorted index can be configured for a table by setting it in the table config:
Note: A Pinot table can only have 1 sorted column
Real-time data ingestion will sort data by the sortedColumn
when generating segments - you don't need to pre-sort the data.
When a segment is committed, Pinot will do a pass over the data in each column and create a sorted index for any other columns that contain sorted data, even if they aren't specified as the sortedColumn
.
Offline tables
For offline data ingestion, Pinot will do a pass over the data in each column and create a sorted index for columns that contain sorted data.
This means that if you want a column to have a sorted index, you will need to sort the data by that column before ingesting it into Pinot.
If you are ingesting multiple segments you will need to make sure that data is sorted within each segment - you don't need to sort the data across segments.
Checking sort status
You can check the sorted status of a column in a segment by running the following:
Alternatively, for offline tables and for committed segments in real-time tables, you can retrieve the sorted status from the getServerMetadata endpoint. The following example is based on the Batch Quick Start:
Raw value forward index
The raw value forward index directly stores values instead of ids.
Without the dictionary, the dictionary lookup step can be skipped for each value fetch. The index can also take advantage of the good locality of the values, thus improving the performance of scanning a large number of values.
The raw value forward index works well for columns that have a large number of unique values where a dictionary does not provide much compression.
As seen in the above diagram, using dictionary encoding will require a lot of random accesses of memory to do those dictionary look-ups. With a raw value forward index, we can scan values sequentially, which can result in improved query performance when applied appropriately.
A raw value forward index can be configured for a table by configuring the table config, as shown below:
Dictionary encoded vs raw value
When working out whether a column should use dictionary encoded or raw value encoding, the following comparison table may help:
Dictionary | Raw Value |
---|---|
Provides compression when low to medium cardinality. | Eliminates padding overhead |
Allows for indexing (esp inv index). | No inv index (only JSON/Text/FST index) |
Adds one level of dereferencing, so can increase disk seeks | Eliminates additional dereferencing, so good when all docs of interest are contiguous |
For Strings, adds padding to make all values equal length in the dictionary | Chunk de-compression overhead with docs selected don't have spatial locality |
Last updated